Ephebophile's Lolita Complex

The Whore, and the Porn Star

Posted in The Christian Faith by ephebophile on January 25, 2010

“Grown men should not be having sex with prostitutes unless they are married to them.”

-JERRY FALWELL, Crossfire, May 17, 1997

Pornographers in the United States have often said that while the act of prostitution is illegal, adding a camera to the event gives them the protection of the First Amendment. They have been given carte blanc to operate the business of prostitution by another name. The non-crime has multitudes of virtual “Johns” who vicariously fulfill their decadent behavior, through the “actors and actresses”.

The pornographers however fail to understand something very critical. The First Amendment is God given right, and not derived from the government. It is first, Inalienable (cannot be taken away), for them to claim it, and be in denial about the existence of God is to undermine their very claim to protection. If they are correct <which of course they are not> then what the State has given, the State can, and shall take away. But understand that God bestowed it. Secondly, because it was in fact, God who granted it; it follows that His standard of judgment for the use or misuse of the gift remains in full effect.

How then does the God of the bible view pornography?

While camera’s didn’t exist when the new testament was being written…. the very word porn comes from that era. Its sourced from a greek word. πόρνη    ( pornē) and it’s primary meaning is whore. Its closely tied to porneo which is “all manor of sexual acts”, outside of the confines of a wife and husband relationship.

Translations from this Greek word into other languages use the term “sexual immorality”

For example:

Ephesians 5:1

But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God’s holy people.”

Eh?  So what is the conclusion, where was the author of Ephesians going with this?

For of this you can be sure: No sexually immoral, impure or greedy person—such a man is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God’s wrath comes on those who are disobedient.”

Where would porn consumers, pornographers, porn stars and whores go, if the don’t stop practicing their activities?

Its quite clear that it is someplace other then heaven.

Are you suggesting that the bible says that Sex is bad?

Not in the least, only that the bible makes the following distinction:

Sexual activities that God approves of are those that do not defile the marriage bed. Remember that the bible says: He gave His blessing to humanity and said “Be fruitful & multiply…”

There is only one way to receive that blessing, and it requires using the sexual body parts.

But wasn’t Jesus friends with whores?

As a matter of fact he was, and he said: “I assure you, Tax Collectors and Whores will enter the Kingdom before you” while addressing the Priests, Preachers, and Religious Lawyers.

He said it to their face! But lets also remember the fact, that He on separate occasions, told a whore: “I forgive you, Now stop sinning unless you want something worse to happen to you”

There is a way to say all of that with just one word.

In fact, Jesus used that one word alot.

“Repent”



Advertisements

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] Ephebophile – “The Whore, and the Porn Star” […]

  2. Will S. said, on January 31, 2010 at 9:16 am

    It is striking, isn’t it, that hard-core pornography is apparently not viewed by the Law as prostitution, for the sole reason that those paying for the sexual intercourse (the consumers of porn) are not themselves engaged in the sexual acts for which they are paying the performers. But prostitution it is, nevertheless; a porn star is someone paid to engage in sexual activity, in exchange for money; they simply do so in front of a camera (and again, not with those paying them). How messed up is it, then, that our society can turn porn stars into celebrities, lauding them and celebrating them, whilst simultaneously coming down hard, with the full weight of the law (fines; jail time, publishing of names and pictures, reputations ruined), upon ‘nobodies’, i.e. anonymous whores and johns, who do the same thing, without sharing their acts with the whole world? Although both are immoral from a Christian perspective, I’d say the unknown people doing it behind closed doors, are surely less sinful than those who publicly parade their vice, and in celebrating wickedness publicly, are doing more damage to the spiritual fabric of our society, than some anonymous fornicators, ruining only the lives of themselves and those closest to them, rather than the many of society, impacted by porn. And surely, those who enable the public vice by bankrolling it, even if not partaking themselves, are sharing in that sin.

    O tempora; o mores!

    • ephebophile said, on February 1, 2010 at 11:54 pm

      Yep, remember the first sin, was Pride. It entered the heart of Lucifer and was the cause of his downfall. The porn star glories in his/her sin. So ya, I am inclined to agree that the weight of their sins is higher then the sins of those who don’t parade it and rub it in the face of civil society.

  3. Will S. said, on January 31, 2010 at 9:23 am

    P.S. I’ve heard there is a brothel in Prague, Czech Republic, which doesn’t charge the johns – anyone who walks in off the street – for the services of the whores, in exchange for allowing their acts to be filmed, and apparently put up on a website which charges a fee to view said acts. Thus, in that case, prostitution and pornography are one and the same; the connection is explicit and undeniable. Another sad sign of the times…

  4. TAllagash said, on February 1, 2010 at 12:01 am

    rape rates are lower in areas with more internet access and more access to porn. sad, but true.

    • ephebophile said, on February 1, 2010 at 2:44 am

      I hear conflicting statistics from the porn apologists. I don’t have enough to information to make a ruling on the veracity of these shills. Greed is a primary causative force for many people to manufacture lies. For an example, how many people have lied for Big Tobacco?

      People who haven’t seen “Thank you for smoking” REALLY need to see it…

      And then they need to have a WOW! OMG! “I get it” moment, realizing Satan has ad men pitching the benefits of every sin. (lies, bald lies, and damned lies)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thank_You_for_Smoking

  5. Nick said, on February 4, 2010 at 11:09 pm

    So you are an ephebophile who is a Christian and deplores the sins of sexual immorality? It seems like this is a very unlikely combination, am I missing something?

  6. ephebophile said, on February 5, 2010 at 11:14 am

    Well Nick, lets define Christian sometime… and depending on your definition I may or may not be one.

    I can easily reconcile the two that you seem to think are not reconcilable.

    As for being an ephebophile… let me give you my personal definition.

    1. one who can/does or will love a “post” pubescent young woman aka adolescent girl (think high school senior cheerleader captain or Anne Frank, or Holy Mary). But certainly not one who desires a “Prepubescent”.

    Lets break it down further.

    “Loves”… as in bound by covenant love. An actual providential that is Legally binding until death, AGAIN… until Death…
    or infidelity, shown by providing food, clothing, shelter, security and every other Need.

    An ephebopile (my type) is someone who is traditional and conservative. He cannot pump-n-dump or any do any other form of sexual immorality.

    While the very idea of an AOC for purely sexual relations cannot be found anywhere within the bible, there is a clear understanding found in the Bible of what is a child and what is an adult.

    The act of bar-mitsvah or bat-mitsvah is the coming of age and to be treated as an adult.

    Indeed, according to Ancient Jewish tradition men become adults — hence “marriageable” and ready for sex — at 13 and girls at 12.

    The age of consent for sexual relations in the Vatican is 12, the age when many girls achieve menses, and are thus reproductive and therefore physically capable of marriage and childbirth.

    However, the Vatican does not allow sex outside of marriage. The 1983 Code of Canon Law states:
    “A man before he has completed his sixteenth year of age, and likewise a woman before she has completed her fourteenth year of age, cannot enter a valid marriage”. Thus it was a sin in the roman catholic system, of fornication but not child molestation in the 12-13 year old’s case.

    According to The Disappearance of Childhood by Neil Postman, the Christian Church of the Middle Ages considered the age of accountability, when a person could be tried and even executed as an adult, to be age 7.

    Interestingly enough, the goalpost shifts around even more if you look at civil or common law statutes regulating the sexual activities of the “we the people”.

    The british common law, from which America gets much of its precedents in the legal field, set the age of consent at age ten.

    Then, according to the LAW, participating in sexual activity with someone above the age of ten did not result in the crime of “statutory” rape or child molesting. The activity may have come under other statutory or informal social regulations, but anyone over the age of ten could consent to a sexual activity.

    During the latter part of the last century and the early part of the present one, attitudes towards sexual activity began to change in America and so did attitudes toward the age of consent.

    California was one of the first states to raise the age of consent. It raised it from ten to fourteen in 1889 and then from fourteen to sixteen in 1897. Then, in 1913, California again raised it from sixteen to eighteen. While for a period of time, under Tennessee law, it was a felony to have sex with any woman under twenty-one.

    WOW! A whole lot of goalpost moving.

    I personally, think that Ten is entirely too young for a 40 year old man. However, I cannot conscience the same for a 16 year old. Feminist-socialist modern education pollutes peoples heads, we spoil young men and women and make them delinquent to their own majority party.

    Quite apropos if your intent is to destroy the traditional nuclear family and its mating customs.

    We used to celebrate the coming out of our minors into their majority with a thing called a debutante’s ball. It was their debut… letting the eligible men know they were now available, and open to courting and marriage.

    In Spanish american countries and latin-american neighborhoods in the US there is an event called “Quinceañera”. This is the latina’s right of passage into womanhood on or just after her 15th birthday.

    The French used to have a thing called “Cotillion” literally, petticoat, from Old French.
    It was a ballroom gown, and the ball was called the same. This were the Belles would have a ball. WASPs engaged in the same thing. And the Jewish have the bar and bat-mitsvah.

    But suddenly what was a social norm, has been redefined into a crime. We have discarded abstinence and purity in favor of convenient and casual premarital sex.
    Then we have placed new laws upon the same, while discarding the protections of a husband of his spouse in favor of the Nanny State.

    The only thing better then female solitude is lesbianism.

    Did you know that in Australia, in New South Wales… there is NO female to female age of consent law. NONE.

    Old Lesbians can choose to prey upon ANY aged minor. And there is nothing a cop can do to stop it.

  7. Ian said, on October 13, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    Sir (or you could be madame, quite frankly for all I know), you are a dizzying lesson in contradictions. By the very array of information you have presented in your defense (as no one is quicker to justify a criminal act than the criminal in question), you better than most it seems should know by now that no law is so concretely defined as the laws of man. Mutable though it may be, IT IS THE LAW. Interpret the bible as you like, but so long as you live your life as human being, the laws where you reside are as applicable to you as they are to any. I hope for your sake, you keep to your notion of ‘love’ as an emotional one. The physical reality, you will find, of loving the underaged (in a realist sense of the word; one I hope you are equally familiar with), will make watching pornography seem like a heavenly pastime…

    I’ve counseled dozens of girls who have been so ‘loved’, at your meaning, by older men. If these men do not sense a mutual affection, or one that matches theirs, their desperation for connection leads down a very illegal path. I tell you; fighting your own human nature is exponentially harder than reason and logic when it comes to how we face the world. I pray you look for counselling, and take necessary steps to preserve your own earthly cleanliness.

  8. get paid to watch porn said, on July 23, 2014 at 8:48 am

    Hey There. I discovered your weblog using msn. That is a really neatly written article.
    I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read extra of your helpful info.
    Thank you for the post. I will certainly return.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: